Postgres Is Enough for More Than We Admit
This short piece argues that many teams add extra databases, queues, caches, and services before they actually need them.
R/PROGRAMMING (TOP) — It is worth reading for its practical framing of when Postgres can stay the center of a stack, and when a separate tool really earns its place.
The website postgresisenough.dev suggests that developers often overcomplicate their infrastructure by integrating additional databases, search engines, caches, and message queues long before the actual scale of their project justifies such additions.
While acknowledging that Postgres is not a universal solution for every possible scenario, the author argues that it is sufficient for the vast majority of real-world applications. The core benefit is the simplicity of "boring infrastructure," which is significantly easier to monitor, back up, and debug than a fragmented ecosystem of specialized tools.
The piece warns against designing architectures for a future scale that may never materialize, as this often leads to operational complexity that hinders development rather than helping it.
Readers’ Forum
No contributions yet — open the debate.
Open the discussion
No account or password needed — just enter your e-mail and we’ll send you a one-time sign-in link. First time here? You’re set up automatically.
Your rating will be applied automatically after you sign in.
Check your inbox
We’ve sent a sign-in link to …. Open it on this device — this tab will sign you in automatically.
Waiting for your click …
·